<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Down to a Science &#187; Earthquakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencecafesf.com/category/earthquakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com</link>
	<description>A San Francisco Science Cafe and Science Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:38:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Enough with &#8220;The Next Big One&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2008/03/22/enough-with-the-next-big-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2008/03/22/enough-with-the-next-big-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2008/03/22/enough-with-the-next-big-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Once again, there was front page news in the SF chronicle on earthquakes. Every few months, we get a new study saying essentially the same thing: Hayward Fault has earthquakes on average 140 years apart (based on the last 5). The last big one was 1868, so its time to be concerned. Most likely, the earthquake will be 6-7 range based on statistics, but there are more homes on the Hayward than any other fault in the Bay Area.
What this new study shows is the rate of uninsured along the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2008/03/21/mn_damage21.jpg"><img width="350" src="http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2008/03/21/mn_damage21.jpg" alt="Hayward Shaking Costs" /></a></p>
<p>Once again, there was front page news in the SF chronicle on earthquakes. Every few months, we get a new study saying essentially the same thing: Hayward Fault has earthquakes on average 140 years apart (based on the last 5). The last big one was 1868, so its time to be concerned. Most likely, the earthquake will be 6-7 range based on statistics, but there are more homes on the Hayward than any other fault in the Bay Area.</p>
<p>What this new study shows is the rate of uninsured along the fault. 95% of residences along the fault are NOT insured, exposing millions to some serious risk. But if <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/business/2008/03/18/foreman.keep.honest.cnn?iref=videosearch">Bear Stearns</a> taught us anything, the government will pick up the tab. </p>
<p>Other than that, the info on shaking hasn&#8217;t changed much since our <a href="http://www.sciencecafesf.com/past-cafes/earthquakes/">April talk on the Hayward Fault</a>. </p>
<p><strong>More Info</strong><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1899&#038;from=rss_home">USGS Press Release</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://1868alliance.org/">1868 Hayward Alliance (Preparation and Safety)</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/strongmotion/intensity/1868.html">Predictive Intensity Map along Hayward Fault</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2008/03/22/enough-with-the-next-big-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Andreas Hike Recap</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/11/08/san-andreas-hike-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/11/08/san-andreas-hike-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science in Action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/11/08/san-andreas-hike-recap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This past weekend, 6 DtaS attendees strapped on their boots and hit the trail. Considering the recent 5.6 quake last week, what better time to learn about faults here in the Bay Area?
Six of us hit the dusty trail in Los Trancos Open Space Preserve. It was a docent led hike and our leader was quite knowledgeable. Over the course of the 2-3 mike hike (click the link to see a virtual tour of the hike), we were learned about basic earthquake science, with a eye on the 1906 quake. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/107/Intro/Image7.gif" alt="San Andreas Fault" /><br />
This past weekend, 6 DtaS attendees strapped on their boots and hit the trail. Considering the recent <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/31/MN7FOGO71.DTL&#038;hw=earthquake&#038;sn=012&#038;sc=305">5.6 quake</a> last week, what better time to learn about faults here in the Bay Area?</p>
<p>Six of us hit the dusty trail in Los Trancos Open Space Preserve. It was a docent led hike and our leader was quite knowledgeable. Over the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/exploration/view/2">course of the 2-3 mike hike</a> (click the link to see a virtual tour of the hike), we were learned about basic earthquake science, with a eye on the 1906 quake. Many after effects of the 1906 quake were still visible, from tree trunks growing sideways to flat earthquake &#8220;benches&#8221; formed on the side of the hill. Most fascinating was the view from the hillside&#8230;you could see how the San Andreas snaked toward San Francisco, especially into Crystal Spring reservoir.</p>
<p>This hike is offered once a month. Check out the calender on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.openspace.org/activities/default.asp">Los Trancos&#8217; website</a> for more information.</p>
<p>
<strong>-- SimpleFlickr Content --</strong><br />
(Please visit the original post page to view the details.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/11/08/san-andreas-hike-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Videos, Pictures, and a Presentation&#8230;Oh my!</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/05/02/videos-pictures-and-the-presentation-oh-my/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/05/02/videos-pictures-and-the-presentation-oh-my/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/05/02/videos-pictures-and-the-presentation-oh-my/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Last week&#8217;s inaugural event was a tremendous success. About 35 people learned about the Hayward fault, it&#8217;s destructive capability and the techniques being used to find out more. 
For those of you who missed out: videos, pics, and Jack&#8217;s presentation have been posted on the Past Cafes page. You can download the video or watch it online.
See you in a few weeks!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/208/472800370_1476b32080_m.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="Jack and the Hayward" /></p>
<p>Last week&#8217;s inaugural event was a tremendous success. About 35 people learned about the Hayward fault, it&#8217;s destructive capability and the techniques being used to find out more. </p>
<p>For those of you who missed out: videos, pics, and Jack&#8217;s presentation have been posted on the <a href="http://www.sciencecafesf.com/past-cafes/">Past Cafes</a> page. You can download the video or watch it online.</p>
<p>See you in a few weeks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/05/02/videos-pictures-and-the-presentation-oh-my/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For the Quakers</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/19/for-the-quakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/19/for-the-quakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/19/for-the-quakers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are something interesting links for the earthquake fanatic:
Nor Cal USGS
Real Time Earthquake Maps (California-Nevada)
Real-time Shaking Maps for California earthquakes of Magnitude 3.5 and larger
1906 San Francisco Earthquake ShakeMaps
Earthquake Probabilities for the San Francisco Bay Area
USGS and other scientists conclude that there is a 62% probability of at least one magnitude 6.7 or greater quake, capable of causing widespread damage, striking the San Francisco Bay region before 2032. 
General Quake Info
Earthquake basics and educational material; geological and historical information; links to professional and amateur organizations; online access to earthquake data.
Hazards ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are something interesting links for the earthquake fanatic:</p>
<p><a href="http://quake.usgs.gov/" target="_blank">Nor Cal USGS</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/latest.htm">Real Time Earthquake Maps (California-Nevada)</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.usgs.gov/recent/shaking.html">Real-time Shaking Maps for California earthquakes of Magnitude 3.5 and larger</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1135/">1906 San Francisco Earthquake ShakeMaps</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.usgs.gov/research/seismology/wg02/">Earthquake Probabilities for the San Francisco Bay Area</a><br />
USGS and other scientists conclude that there is a 62% probability of at least one magnitude 6.7 or greater quake, capable of causing widespread damage, striking the San Francisco Bay region before 2032. </p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.usgs.gov/info/basics.html">General Quake Info</a><br />
Earthquake basics and educational material; geological and historical information; links to professional and amateur organizations; online access to earthquake data.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.usgs.gov/prepare/hazards.html">Hazards &#038; Preparedness</a><br />
How to prepare your home, business and family for earthquake hazards; earthquake probabilities; shaking hazard maps; liquefaction hazard and earthquake engineering.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.usgs.gov/research/index.html">Earthquake Research</a><br />
Current research activities and results in seismology, crustal structure and deformation, geology and borehole physics.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://seismo.berkeley.edu/">UC Berkeley Quake Site</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.consrv.ca.gov/CGS/rghm/quakes/historical/index.htm">Historical Earthquake Intensity Information</a></p>
<p>1868 Hayward Earthquake History:<br />
<a target ="_blank" href="http://www.museumoflocalhistory.org/pages/list.php?topic=earthquake">http://www.museumoflocalhistory.org/pages/list.php?topic=earthquake</a><br />
<a target ="_blank" href="http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist1/1868eq.html">http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist1/1868eq.html</a><br />
<a target ="_blank" href="http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist4/68oakl.html">http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist4/68oakl.html</a><br />
<a target ="_blank" href="http://seismo.berkeley.edu/faq/1868_0.html">http://seismo.berkeley.edu/faq/1868_0.html</a><br />
<a target ="_blank" href="http://cires.colorado.edu/~bilham/HaywardCreep.html">http://cires.colorado.edu/~bilham/HaywardCreep.html</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/geologic_hazards/earthquakes/">California Department of Insurance &#8211; California Earthquake Information </a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.notfrisco.com/calmem/earthquake/sidebar.html">California Reader: Stories about earthquakes</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.seismo.berkeley.edu/seismo/hayward/hayward.overview.html">Hayward Fault Tour</a><br />
A website showing the surface expressions of the Hayward Fault. </p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/geology/paleoseis/">Paleoseismology, Hayward Fault, California</a><br />
A large, widely damaging earthquake will occur on the Hayward fault in the future. That much we know. What we don&#8217;t know is when.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/strongmotion/intensity/1868.html">Predictive Intensity Map for 1868 Hayward Fault</a><br />
This is the intensity distribution we would expect for a repeat of the 1868 earthquake which was a M=7.0 event on the Hayward fault. </p>
<p>Finally there is a great <a target="_blank" href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2006/177/">Google Earth Flyover of the Hayward fault</a> put together by Jim Lienkaemper, a USGS geologist. Map showing active fault traces within the Hayward Fault Zone, including a virtual tour of the Hayward fault in the east San Francisco Bay Region that can be viewed in the Google Earth. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/19/for-the-quakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Next Great Earthquake (M9 or greater)</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/01/the-next-great-earthquake-m9-or-greater/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/01/the-next-great-earthquake-m9-or-greater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/01/the-next-great-earthquake-m9-or-greater/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magnitude 9 quakes are generally caused by subduction events. There are 40,000 km of subduction boundaries around the Pan Pacific Rim. Seismologists have been studying these subduction zones to identify high risk areas for high mag quakes. Why? A mag 9.0 quake caused the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia, killing over 300K. 
Earthquake science utilizes all sorts of data, earth temperature, geologic features, physics, even historical data. When you boil down the search for the next big one, we always end up at a question of probability. 
Looking at all this ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magnitude 9 quakes are generally caused by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subduction"  target="_blank">subduction</a> events. There are 40,000 km of subduction boundaries around the Pan Pacific Rim. Seismologists have been studying these subduction zones to identify high risk areas for high mag quakes. Why? A mag 9.0 quake caused the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia, killing over 300K. </p>
<p>Earthquake science utilizes all sorts of data, earth temperature, geologic features, physics, even historical data. When you boil down the search for the next big one, we always end up at a question of probability. </p>
<p>Looking at all this data, they have identified a number of troubling (ie high probability) subduction zones. One big problem, the Sumatran-Andaman earthquake that caused the 2004 tsunami did NOT occur in a likely zone. </p>
<p>What does that mean? Most likely, our understanding of &#8220;danger&#8221; subduction zones is by no means refined. That doesn&#8217;t mean we should abandon our study of these zones, but frankly admitting our lack of knowledge  in this area seems right on.<br />
<span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>When it comes to policy, all of these subduction zones need to be treated as dangerous. Knowing tsunamis can travel thousands of miles with little loss of violence, a threat along a US West coast subduction zone is a threat even to Japan. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a worry here in the states? Check out <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ess.washington.edu/SEIS/PNSN/HAZARDS/CASCADIA/cascadia_event.html">this</a>, a suggestion that a M9 earthquake helped formed Seattle. </p>
<p>For more information:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/rpi-tng031907.php">The Next Great Earthquake</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/04/01/the-next-great-earthquake-m9-or-greater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tokyo needs a big piece of floss</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/03/22/tokyo-needs-a-big-piece-of-floss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/03/22/tokyo-needs-a-big-piece-of-floss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/03/22/tokyo-needs-a-big-piece-of-floss/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tokyo and the Kanto Plain lie above the convergence of 3 tetonic plates. Luckily, only 30 million people live in that area. 
A joint US-Tokyo research team recently tackled the likelihood of a severe shaking incident around Tokyo (not including the unnatural shaking from a Godzilla attack). They found a two pronged issue, offshore earthquakes and below ground quakes. 
A offshore magnitude 8 quake in 1923 killed 105,000 people. The focus was on a recurrence of a large offshore quake. By dating terraces perched above the shore, they found that ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tokyo and the Kanto Plain lie above the convergence of 3 tetonic plates. Luckily, only 30 million people live in that area. </p>
<p>A joint US-Tokyo research team recently tackled the likelihood of a severe shaking incident around Tokyo (not including the unnatural shaking from a Godzilla attack). They found a two pronged issue, offshore earthquakes and below ground quakes. </p>
<p>A offshore magnitude 8 quake in 1923 killed 105,000 people. The focus was on a recurrence of a large offshore quake. By dating terraces perched above the shore, they found that large offshore quakes regularly occur every 400 years. Probability (the name of the game in quake science) of an offshore in the next 30? 0.5% </p>
<p>But the news isn&#8217;t all good. The chance of a large quake below Tokyo in the next 30? 20%. They discovered a 25 km thick chunk broken off and stuck in between the 3 plates below Tokyo. They believe this chunk to be the source of the moderate close-in quakes. Unless the Earth starts flossing more, Tokyo will be under a threat of a large earthquake for years to come.</p>
<p>Want to know more? Check out <a href="http://sicarius.wr.usgs.gov/tokyo/about.html" target="blank">Team Tokyo&#8217;s</a> website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencecafesf.com/2007/03/22/tokyo-needs-a-big-piece-of-floss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
